Acceptance procedure

Thank you for your interest in LAWorld. The application process can take between 4-8 weeks and the procedure for joining is as follows:

  • Once you have read the Membership Application Documents and wish to initiate an application for membership, please complete and return the LAWorld Application Form to us. There is no cost or obligation at this stage.
  • Upon receipt of this application form at our Executive Office it is circulated to the LAWorld Committee and the Chair, who are Principal Partners of LAWorld member firms. There is one Committee member for each LAWorld region – Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa, North America and Latin America. Our current Chair is Steve Ng, Managing Partner of Ng & Shum, with offices in Hong Kong and mainland China.
  • The Committee will decide if they have any questions at this stage or if references are to be taken. If so, the Executive Director, Mrs Jacqui Nash, will email you to seek permission to approach the independent references you have provided in your application form.
  • If you have been referred to us by another LAWorld member, we will take a reference from them.
  • After the references have been reviewed by the Committee, it will decide if your application should be recommended to the entire membership. If so, your application will be circulated to our membership with a deadline for their comments.
  • The decision of the members is notified a couple of weeks later.
  • We will keep in regular contact with you during the application process

LAWorld News

IRS proposes new regulations on carried interests and fee waivers as disguised compensation

The Internal Revenue Service of America recently proposed new guidelines that, under certain circumstances, would re-characterize carried and other service-related equity interests in partnerships (which for tax purposes includes limited liability companies) as disguised payments for services. 

If a partnership interest granted to a service provider is re-characterized as disguised compensation, then the service-related partnership interest disappears for tax purposes and the service provider is no longer treated as an equity owner (i.e., a partner or member) with respect to the service-related partnership interest. As a result, partnership allocations and distributions made on the service-related partnership interest to the service provider become ordinary compensation income (even if the partnership’s underlying income consists of capital gains), potentially subject to FICA and other employment-related tax provisions.

Taking an overall “facts and circumstances” approach, the proposed regulations view the presence or absence of “significant entrepreneurial risk” (which itself is also determined in light of the overall facts and circumstances) as the overriding indicator of whether a service-related partnership interest is a disguised compensation arrangement. If a service-related partnership interest carries “significant entrepreneurial risk,” the partnership interest will generally not be treated as a disguised compensation arrangement, unless the presence of other compensation-related factors indicates otherwise (e.g., transitory or short-term equity ownership, allocations and distributions tied to the types of services rendered or made over periods comparable to those over which non-partner service providers would typically receive payment, and a small continuing interest in overall partnership profits).

In contrast, a service-related partnership interest without “significant entrepreneurial risk” is deemed to be a disguised compensation arrangement, regardless of the degree to which other compensation-related factors may or may not be present. The presence of any one of the following five factors creates a presumption that no “significant entrepreneurial risk” exists: (1) a cap on allocations if the cap is reasonably expected to apply in most years, (2) an allocation for one or more years if the service provider’s income share is reasonably certain, (3) an allocation of gross income, (4) an allocation that is either (A) fixed in amount, (B) reasonably determinable, or (C) designed to assure that sufficient net profits are highly likely to be available for the service provider (such as a profit share for a specific transaction or accounting period that is not tied to the long-term success of the enterprise) or (5) a fee waiver that is either (A) non-binding or (B) is not disclosed timely to the partnership and its partners. By way of an example discussing the grant of a partnership interest to an investment manager in lieu of a management fee, the proposed regulations indicate that an irrevocable fee waiver made and disclosed to the investment fund’s limited partners at least 60 days prior to the start of the period for which the management fee would otherwise have been payable does not cause the partnership interest to lack “significant entrepreneurial risk.”

Although purportedly intended to address fee waivers in the investment fund context, the scope of the proposed regulations is not so limited and may affect tax planning for carried interests in partnerships engaged in real estate and other active businesses. As shown in the included examples, the proposed regulations conclude that “significant entrepreneurial risk” exists when a carried interest’s participation in partnership allocations and distributions is tied to and limited by the partnership’s overall lifetime profitability (combined with a corresponding “clawback” obligation). However, the proposed regulations fail to give any negative guidance on when a carried interest lacks “significant entrepreneurial risk.” So, when deciding to accept a carried or other partnership interest, service providers should consider carefully the extent to which any deviation from the terms of the example partnership interests increases the probability that the partnership interest will be found to lack “significant entrepreneurial” risk” (e.g., by omitting the lifetime profit limitation and/or any clawback obligation).

The proposed regulations are intended to apply only to partnership arrangements entered into or modified after the date on which the regulations are issued in final form. However, the IRS views the proposed regulations as a clarification of existing law, hinting that it may seek to apply the principles set forth in the proposed regulations to pre-existing partnership arrangements.

For more information, please contact Andrew Lustigman, Partner with Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, a law firm based in New York: http://www.laworld.com/laworldmembers/view_company/83 

Email: alustigman@olshanlaw.com  

Business News

Suzuki Motor says to buy back VW stake as tribunal settles long feud
Sun, 30 Aug 2015 07:35:25 GMT
TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan's Suzuki Motor Corp said on Sunday it will buy back the 19.9 percent stake i...
Tycoon to the rescue as cheaper China floods Vietnam's economy
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 22:37:19 GMT
HANOI (Reuters) - Soldier-turned-tycoon Nguyen Huu Duong is a fierce patriot still fighting to prote...
Fed's Fischer sees inflation rebound, allowing gradual rate hikes
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:49:27 GMT
JACKSON HOLE, Wyo. (Reuters) - U.S. inflation will likely rebound as pressure from the dollar fades,...
'Good reason to believe' inflation will rise: Fed's Fischer
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 18:51:10 GMT
JACKSON HOLE, Wyo. (Reuters) - U.S. inflation will likely rebound as pressure from the dollar and ot...

Upcoming Events

LAWorld Annual Conference (Cape Town) from 5pm on Tuesday the 5th of April, 2016 to 2pm on Friday the 8th of April, 2016

Europe/Middle East Regional Meeting and Lawyers Next Generation (Bratislava) from 5pm on Friday the 5th of February, 2016 to 5pm on Saturday the 6th of February, 2016

North and South America Regional Meeting (Miami) from 6pm on Wednesday the 11th of November, 2015 to 2pm on Friday the 13th of November, 2015

Europe/Middle East Regional Meeting and Lawyers Next Generation (Milan) from 5pm on Friday the 18th of September, 2015 to 5pm on Saturday the 19th of September, 2015

See All Events
 
LAWorld
Email: mail@laworld.com