Acceptance procedure

Thank you for your interest in LAWorld. The application process can take between 4-8 weeks and the procedure for joining is as follows:

  • Once you have read the Membership Application Documents and wish to initiate an application for membership, please complete and return the LAWorld Application Form to us. There is no cost or obligation at this stage.
  • Upon receipt of this application form at our Executive Office it is circulated to the LAWorld Committee and the Chair, who are Principal Partners of LAWorld member firms. There is one Committee member for each LAWorld region – Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa, North America and Latin America. Our current Chair is Steve Ng, Managing Partner of Ng & Shum, with offices in Hong Kong and mainland China.
  • The Committee will decide if they have any questions at this stage or if references are to be taken. If so, the Executive Director, Mrs Jacqui Nash, will email you to seek permission to approach the independent references you have provided in your application form.
  • If you have been referred to us by another LAWorld member, we will take a reference from them.
  • After the references have been reviewed by the Committee, it will decide if your application should be recommended to the entire membership. If so, your application will be circulated to our membership with a deadline for their comments.
  • The decision of the members is notified a couple of weeks later.
  • We will keep in regular contact with you during the application process

LAWorld News

Selecting New York To Resolve International Disputes

International businesses that wish to eliminate the "home field" advantage in litigation or arbitration, take note: New York can serve as both the host forum and the source of law for international business disputes.  This is true even if the dispute has no connection to New York or even the United States.

Because so many judges, arbitrators and attorneys in New York have participated in complex business litigation, New York is considered a sophisticated and desired forum for the resolution of international business disputes.  Courts and arbitrators recognize the importance of facilitating international commerce and, in a city that has proclaimed itself as a melting pot for decades, they are not known for discriminating against foreigners.

Recognizing its status as a hub of international commerce, New York has codified the right of commercial parties in involved in contractual disputes of at least $250,000 to select New York as the governing law for future litigation regardless of whether the underlying transaction bears any relationship to New York.  This guarantee is codified in New York General Obligation Law ("GOL") § 5-1401.

New York law goes even further, and guarantees to serve as the host forum if the transaction or agreement also involves $1 million or more, and the parties agree to submit to the jurisdiction of New York courts. In such cases, New York courts will entertain lawsuits against a foreign corporation, non-resident, or foreign state, and the aggrieved party may bring suit in New York.  GOL § 5-1402.  This means that foreign parties, by contract, can agree to have a dispute adjudicated under New York law and litigated in New York even where the agreement otherwise does not relate to New York.  

An example of how these statutes play out is contained a 2013 case styled Credit Suisse v. URBI Desarollos Urbanos (decided in New York County’s Supreme Court).  Credit Suisse sued a Mexican company, alleging the Mexican company defaulted on a credit swap agreement.  Seeking to force Credit Suisse to bring suit in Mexico, URBI moved to dismiss on the basis that Credit Suisse was a foreign corporation not licensed to do business in New York. Credit Suisse admitted its New York registration was not current, but nonetheless opposed the motion to dismiss on the basis that the parties had a contract that satisfied with requirements of GOL § 5-1402. 

The Court maintained jurisdiction over the case, giving Credit Suisse sixty days to renew its registration to do business in New York, and allowing it to maintain the lawsuit in the interim. The Court wrote, “it is well established that the operative effect of GOL § 5–1402 is to preclude a New York Court from declining jurisdiction even where the only nexus is the contractual agreement.”

The ruling had two primary benefits for Credit Suisse. First, it prevented URBI from avoiding accountability, and second, it saved Credit Suisse from having to sue a Mexican business in Mexican court, where it likely feared an inhospitable forum.

In addition to New York courts, international businesses can also select New York as the locale for arbitration.   The International Centre For Dispute Resolution (ICDR) maintains offices in New York and is utilized to resolve cross-border commercial disputes.  Arbitration in New York is particularly advantageous as the majority of the world’s nations have ratified the New York Convention, which provides for enforcement of arbitral decisions.

Takeaway: While there are some exceptions, including contracts involving labor, personal, family or household services, the two New York General Obligation statutes ensure that parties to many international transactions can obtain a measure of predictability in contracting, enforcement and dispute resolution. Parties can also eliminate the worry of having to litigate in jurisdictions that are either outright hostile to foreigners or do not have a well-developed body of law to address a particular dispute. The goal of avoiding these uncertainties can be achieved simply by drafting well-crafted choice of law and choice of forum provisions referring the dispute to New York, as a source of law and either a judicial arbitral forum.  Such choices are not difficult to put into effect, but require a little advance planning by contracting parties to ensure that their agreements properly provide for these options. 

For more information or assistance, please contact Andy Lustigman, Olshan Frome Wolosky, New York law firm.  +1 212 451 2300 alustigman@olshanlaw.com   www.olshanlaw.com

Business News

Yellen says Fed rate hike likely appropriate in coming months
Fri, 27 May 2016 17:13:34 -0400
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve should raise interest rates "in the coming months" ...
Verizon strike seen lowering U.S. May payrolls by 35,000 jobs
Fri, 27 May 2016 14:16:17 -0400
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The strike by Verizon Communications Inc workers will probably trim U.S. non...
Wall Street puts finishing touch on best week since March
Fri, 27 May 2016 16:29:48 -0400
(Reuters) - Wall Street rose on Friday and capped off its strongest week since March after U.S. Fede...
U.S. economic growth revised higher in first quarter
Fri, 27 May 2016 15:03:47 -0400
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. economic growth slowed in the first quarter although not as sharply as i...

Upcoming Events

Europe/Middle East Regional Meeting and Lawyers Next Generation (Budapest) from 5pm on Friday the 16th of September, 2016 to 5pm on Saturday the 17th of September, 2016

See All Events
 
LAWorld
Email: mail@laworld.com